{"database": "lobbying", "table": "lobbying_activities", "rows": [[1074104, "70047360-bfae-4003-9c17-a7b58160a08f", "Q1", "NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE", 28481, "NATIONAL RIGHT LIFE COMMITTEE", 2011, "first_quarter", "INS", "U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES\nContacts in support of H.R.2, titled Repealing the Job-Killing Health Care Law Act, because it would 1) eliminate the Independent Payment Advisory Boards  directive to make recommendations designed to limit the ability of Americans to spend enough of their private funds on health care to keep up with the rate of medical inflation, (continued) 2) eliminate the authority of the Secretary of Health and Human Services and other Federal agencies to impose quality and efficiency measures on health care providers  that would limit their ability to provide life-saving medical treatment , based upon the recommendations of the Independent Payment Advisory Board, 3) eliminate the authority of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services to limit Medicare participants  choice of private-fee-for-service plans that allow senior citizens voluntarily to add their own funds on top of the government contribution in order to obtain insurance less likely to deny care, 4) eliminate the requirement that state health insurance exchanges administrators exclude plans offered by insurers  that they deem permit  their customers to spend an unjustified and excessive amount on their health care, and 5) repeal the provision related to shared decisionmaking. \n\nContacts in support of H.R. 452, Medicare Decisions Accountability Act of 2011, which would repeal the provision of Public Law 111-148 directing  the Independent Payment Advisory Board  to make recommendations designed to limit the ability of Americans to spend enough of their private funds on health care to keep up with the rate of medical inflation. \n\nContacts in support of encouraging the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform to hold hearings regarding  the components of Public Law 111-148 relating to the Independent Payment Advisory Board and the authority of the Secretary of Health and Human Services and other Federal agencies to impose quality and efficiency measures on health care providers  that would limit their ability to provide life-saving medical treatment , based upon the recommendations of the Independent Payment Advisory Board.  Contacts in support of encouraging the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform to hold hearings regarding uses of monies granted for comparative effectiveness research under the Public law 111-5.\n\nContacts regarding uses of monies granted for comparative effectiveness research under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-5).\n\nContacts in response to inquiries regarding implementation of  elements of Public Law 111-148 related to the denial of life-saving medical treatments.\n\nContacts in response to inquiries regarding Medicare regulation CMS-2010-0205-1983, which would provide for advance care planning counseling during annual visits.\n\nContacts in regards to legislation (not introduced) over concerns related to 1) the authority of a Health Care Services Commission to restrict access to life-saving care, 2)premium price controls that might reduce the ability of insurance to cover expensive life-saving care, and 3) malpractice limits being made applicable to intentional discriminatory denial of treatment. \n(continued) U.S. SENATE\n\nContacts in support of S.AMDT.13 to S.223 because it would 1) eliminate the Independent Payment Advisory Boards authority to make recommendations designed to limit the ability of Americans to spend enough of their private funds on health care to keep up with the rate of medical inflation, 2) eliminate the authority of the Secretary of Health and Human Services and other Federal agencies to impose quality and efficiency measures on health care providers  that would limit their ability to provide life-saving medical treatment , based upon the recommendations of the Independent Payment Advisory Board, 3) eliminate the authority of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services to limit Medicare participants  choice of private-fee-for-service plans that allow senior citizens voluntarily to add their own funds on top of the government contribution in order to obtain insurance less likely to deny care, 4) eliminate the requirement that state health insurance exchanges administrators exclude plans offered by insurers  that they deem permit  their customers to spend an unjustified and excessive amount on their health care, and 5) repeal the provision related to shared decisionmaking.\n\nContacts in regards to legislation (not introduced) over concerns related to 1) the authority of a Health Care Services Commission to restrict access to life-saving care, 2)premium price controls that might reduce the ability of insurance to cover expensive life-saving care, and 3) malpractice limits being made applicable to intentional denial of treatment, denied for discriminatory reasons. \n\nContacts in opposition to confirming Donald Berwick as the Director of Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services. \n\nContacts in response to inquiries regarding implementation of certain elements of Public Law 111-148 related to the denial of life-saving medical treatments.", "HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,SENATE", null, 104671, 0, 0, "2011-04-12T19:45:05.553000-04:00"]], "columns": ["id", "filing_uuid", "filing_type", "registrant_name", "registrant_id", "client_name", "filing_year", "filing_period", "issue_code", "specific_issues", "government_entities", "income_amount", "expense_amount", "is_no_activity", "is_termination", "received_date"], "primary_keys": ["id"], "primary_key_values": ["1074104"], "units": {}, "query_ms": 0.4401259939186275, "source": "Federal Register API & Regulations.gov API", "source_url": "https://www.federalregister.gov/developers/api/v1", "license": "Public Domain (U.S. Government data)", "license_url": "https://www.regulations.gov/faq"}